
We’d done a decent job of getting ready for the Oscars, in that we’d seen more of the movies than usual. Some, we’d seen in the theater (Marty Supreme, Sinners). Most, we’d streamed. I watched Weapons alone because my husband isn’t a big horror fan. We’d wanted to see Frankenstein in a theater but even in Portland, this proved extremely difficult to find, so we streamed it in all its happily ended pastel gore.
We also streamed One Battle After Another. In shifts. We watched the first half, then paused it while I made dinner and we ate, and then we watched the rest. I do wonder why movies are so long these days, but then I saw Boyhood in a theater so what am I complaining about?
Anyway, I had definite favorites. After we finished One Battle, I said, “If Sean Penn doesn’t win Best Supporting Actor, the Oscars have no meaning.” I was also rooting hard for Teyana Taylor and heartbroken when she didn’t win. I mean, COME ON.
I hadn’t seen Hamnet but assumed Jessie Buckley deserved to win because I’ve never seen her give less than an Oscar-worthy performance. I definitely cheered the roof off when Michael B Jordan won because he also deserved it (but for which role since he played two? I know, it’s for the movie, not a specific role).
I enjoyed Frankenstein for what it was, but it wasn’t the best picture of the year. I had no love for Marty Supreme, and much love for Sinners. Sinners had my vote. But I could live with One Battle as Best Picture. Because it was wildly suspenseful and entertaining and funny and, well, shockingly good, despite the length.
There were a couple of other movies up for many awards that I hadn’t seen. My husband and I kept meaning to watch two contenders. First, there was Hamnet. I’d read the book (and I know this is ridiculous because everyone else loved it) but in a basic way, it failed to work for me. Our main character Agnes, Shakespeare’s wife, seemed too much of a fantasy novel stock-character: the herb-wise forest witch with tangled hair and a hawk on her arm. And here she was as Shakespeare’s wife, and I had a hard time with it. She never quite came to life for me.
The other big Oscar contender we hadn’t seen was Jay Kelly, with George Clooney. This was another one we meant to watch and kept putting off. It looked dumb. The premise sounded puny, restrained, and the trailers I watched seemed to point to a rom-com. Like, screen-idol Dad would follow his daughter to Europe and there he would meet an attractive age-appropriate woman who would finally show him what love meant. And…Scene.
Well, we watched it Saturday night and it was nothing like that. Jay Kelly is a true Hollywood film. It’s huge, sweeping, gorgeous. The opening is alchemical magic. Visually, each shot is a delight for the eyes. The score is expansive without overwhelming. Every performance is pitch perfect. Clooney is an aging screen icon facing how stardom has hollowed out his identity. He is flawed and irresistible. The entire movie is charming and bittersweet and funny and so very, very sad. I’m shocked that Adam Sandler wasn’t nominated for Best Supporting Actor. If he had been, it would have been a tight race in the all-important race for Oscars mentally awarded by one Karen G. Berry.
On Sunday. night, we settled in to watch Hamnet. My husband gently lay some Kleenex on the coffee table before me with the words, “I’ve heard it’s a weepy.” Knowing the story, I assumed he was right.
The good news is that almost immediately, Jessi Buckley’s Agnes filled out all the voids of the written character. Agnes ascended from trope to character right before my eyes. And Paul Mescal is a beautifully human Shakespeare. It’s such a tapestry of a movie. The costumes and set and that gorgeous forest, and every single actor, and the language, and how some of it is muttered but we didn’t turn on the closed captions because that muddling felt intimate and real to my ears.
I thought the movie was beautiful, through and through. But it is not perfect. They had to age up the twins for obvious reasons. In doing so, they lost the neat trick of their illness, the strange and magical and tragic consequence of their closeness. The film extended the related scenes of suffering and healing and limbo to what felt like melodramatic lengths. The tragedy of loss isn’t like that, not really. Losses are internally harrowing. But they are not externally operatic.
ALL THAT ASIDE. Every other part of the movie (okay, the score got a little bombastic at times) but almost every other moment worked for me. What I loved most was how the movie examines the role of writing, drama, and catharsis in its final scenes. When Agnes goes to the play, she literally does not understand what she is seeing. The actors are walking around onstage looking absurd, people with sticks, and she demands to know what they’re doing.
And then, the magic starts for her. Ghost, son, death. She understands. As a writer, her husband has done his processing through writing, and invited the audience to share his pain and help him carry the burden of it. In return they experience catharsis of their own sorrows. I was moved right down into my core.
I’m not sure what else we missed, because we always miss a few. But next year I’m going to do better as far as watching the contenders. My biggest regret is, I wish I’d seen both of these movies in the theater instead of Marty Supreme. You can read what I thought of that here. Marty Supremely Disappoints
I unabashedly enjoy this publication: Dorothy Parker’s Ashes. I’ve been reading it for at least three years, maybe more. I love their mission, their muse, their layout. When a new issue arrives in my inbox, I pop right over to read it. Each issue has a theme, and all the essays are short little works that usually hit just right, if you know what I mean. If you don’t, well, tough cookie, I can’t explain.
And because I admired DPA, I wanted DPA to publish me. Badly.
Now, every writer has their bucket list of dream publications. Salinger’s was The New Yorker. I am not Salinger, and I know better than to expect the New Yorker to publish me. But I can dream of Ploughshares and Sequestrum, can I not? Not to mention Rattle.
Rattle is an amazing publication. The first time I entered the poem of the year contest, I sent off my favorite poem just positive that it would win. And of course it didn’t. As it turns out, none of the other markets I’ve sent this poem to share my enthusiasm for it, but still, it remains my favorite poem I’ve ever written. Anyway, after that first time entering Rattle’s contest, I knew I’d never win because each year I read the Reader’s Choice contestants, and most of them are brilliant, and we only get to vote for one. It is almost impossible. So no, I don’t enter that contest expecting recognition. I just enter to renew my subscription.
But I wanted Persimmon Tree to publish me. And Thin Skin. And they have.
I just looked through my spreadsheet, and I’ve (unsuccessfully) submitted to DPA six times. SIX. This is dogged persistence on my part. I generally don’t allow a publication to hurt my feelings that many times. I mean, a person can only take so much scalding rejection, even though scalding rejection is the name of the game when it comes to submitting your work to the world of literary journals.
One thing I sent was just wrong for this publication, so of course they declined (it has found a home elsewhere). At some point I sent a piece about my minivan that I have no memory of, so it probably wasn’t very good. For their “Secrets” call, I sent a very good piece and wondered why they said no. When the issue came out it turned out my secret was a very common secret.
I sent a sweet piece about my sister for the “Myth” call, which disappeared, which leads me to believe they didn’t receive enough quality submissions to go ahead with a full issue. For the “Body” call, they rejected my piece but sent a personal note that said, “I’m sorry you had to go through all that.” Which was sweet.
Heartbreak came with their “Cops” call. I sent a piece called “Married to One.” I received a note asking for some specific changes. I made them, sent it back and received a “Wonderful, this is great, send your bio right now!” note. I did! I waited for the Cops issue. And waited. And the issue came out and my piece was not in it. I was crushed.
Always a glutton for punishment, I answered their “Heat” call. And GUESS WHAT. On my seventh try, I received an acceptance and thanks for my delightful essay. And the clouds lifted, and the sun shone, and small birds flitted around my head, singing notes of joy.
Not exaggerating. I really love this magazine.
Read my essay here: The Heat Wimp

I love to write poetry in response to art. This poem was inspired by a painting by Jules Bastien-Lepage, of Joan of Arc having a vision. It hangs in the Metropolitan Museum of Art.

My friend Karl says it’s his favorite painting in the European gallery. He guided me to it many years ago.
Read the poem here in Abundance: Joan in the Garden

I know, I know, my sparse readership is absolutely desperate to read my latest reaction to the earlier works of Joni Mitchell, all of which I first heard fifty or more years ago. In my defense, I’d like to say, I’ve been wildly busy. Also in my defense, this deep dive into Joni has elevated her from musical genius to timeless musical genius on a par with any composer who has ever lived, and I mean anyone you can offer up. Say, Mozart. She’s that amazing.
The only problem is, I have that condition called “Stuck Song Syndrome” and if you think that’s a problem for me, well, in general, it is not. I’m resigned to having a song stuck in my head at all times and it only really bothers me when I wake up in the night and there’s a song blaring, note for note, keeping me awake. I have a range of tools to help me go back to sleep but sometimes, I just have to let the song play through, again and again and again.
So the song that’s been stuck in my head is “Electricity.” And it’s driving me crazy, but it’s better than “Banquet,” which preceded it for a week and that’s the first song on For the Roses, so here we go.
I was young when I first heard “Banquet”, and I knew nothing of Canada, or even the fact that Joni is from Canada. So in 1973 as I listened to this song worshipfully, trying to coax my voice up into the impossible register in which it is sung, I’d snag on “Javex bottles on the tide.” What, pray tell, was Javex? We didn’t have the internet in 1973 so I had to let it go, but now I know it’s bleach. Because I just finally looked that up at age 66.
Javex aside, this song like so many songs on this record is an extended metaphor of incredible power. And that, I actually understood at age 13. I was young enough to still suffer the unique affliction of childhood, which is acceptance of my personal life circumstance without question. I hadn’t begun to ask hard questions about my own life—that didn’t come for years—but I was stirred by this questioning of why at the banquet table of society, where there’s more than enough for everyone, “in the cookie I read: some get the gravy, some get the gristle, and some get the marrow bone.” The whole song is an indictment. Also note, at age 13, I had never encountered a fortune cookie, so that was another mystery.
“Cold Blue Steel and Sweet Fire” flew right over my head. And since it’s a gorgeous and haunting look at heroin addiction, that’s unsurprising. But when I listen to it now, the way Joni’s voice swoops in and caresses desperation is unspeakably seductive. I also hear in this song’s clarinet her eventual conversion to jazz.
She offers up a sweet antidote in “Barangrill”. I mean, she’s sitting in a bar getting drunk, admiring the black diamond earrings of waitresses “talking about Zombies and Singapore Slings.” I had no idea what those were at age thirteen, I’d sipped maybe a tenth of a skunky beer at a party once at that age, but I sang along anyway. What I of course didn’t understand was that Joni is asking if simpler lives are happier. That’s a great question from a woman who went to great lengths in order to live a complicated life. Again, there’s a lovely little jazzy flute riff at the end.
“Lesson in Survival.” I loved this song because I loved to sing it, but what could such naked heartbreak say to me at age thirteen? I’d had a boyfriend or two, but never even been kissed. Listening to a grown woman try to navigate her need for love and closeness while being socially awkward around a man’s friends breaks my heart. Oh, I loved that line, “I came in as bright as a neon light and I burned out right there before him.” The way she calls him “my sweet tumbleweed” and then says “if you ever get the notion to be needed by me.” It’s just so open, so painful. “I will always love you…magnet and iron, the soul.”
It’s interesting how this song segues into “Let the Wind Carry Me” with some clarinet, and an examination of her family. How apt. But listen, at age 13, I associated kick pleat skirts, high heels and green eye makeup with my mother’s generation. The Joni I knew and loved wore miniskirts and boots, or long dresses and sandals, and not a speck of makeup, just her long bangs and high cheekbones. I had to really work to reconcile this visual with the woman I was listening to. And of course this song holds a secretive acknowledgment that she had given up a child for adoption. “But it passes like the summer, I’m a wild seed again, let the wind carry me.”
Okay, I love love love “For the Roses.” It is a poem, so rich in metaphor it could collapse under the weight of all this rich language over that lovely folkie guitar picking. Every single line is a poem. I will not bore you with a bunch of repetition, but seriously? “I get these notes on butterflies and lilac sprays from girls who just have to tell me they saw you somewhere” and “Pass around your golden egg, speculation, well who’s to know if the next one in the nest will glitter for them so” and “just when you’re getting a taste for worship they start bringing out the hammer and the boards and the nails.” I don’t know who she wrote it to but I’ll tell you, he never wrote anything as beautiful as this song.
Also I had no idea what arbutus was, or how its rustling might sound, and I still don’t. I’ve decided to leave the mystery intact.
I suppose he’s the same man to whom she wrote “See you sometime”. Oh womanhood, how we circle back, something I didn’t understand would be part of my future. I did love how, in this song, she would “spring from the boulders like a mama lion.” I was doing my share of boulder springing at the ranger station, so I could have possibly finally identified with one line in one song of Joni’s—but only the boulder part. I was only nine years from becoming a mama lion myself, something I didn’t know at age thirteen. At the time, I considered motherhood impossible and had no intention of taking it on. But hey, I could leap!
Another beautiful, playful extended metaphor. I remember listening to this repeatedly in utter confusion, having never seen a fuse box in my young life, but at some point I put it together with something I’d read and understood what I was listening to. Love as electricity, and electricity itself saying, hey, maybe I’d like a break from all these overloaded lines, sparks flying, “loose wires flying out at me.” Electricity itself was also considering going back to nature with “a good dog and some trees, out of touch with the breakdown of this century.” And I also understood “While the song that he sang her to soothe her to sleep runs all through her circuits like a heartbeat.” There she was, singing about this adult world of love and intimacy that terrified me, even as it beckoned me.
This song is short, and when it’s circling in my brain, I can let it run all the way to the end. Sometimes that brings the stuckness to a halt. And I love that vocal trill at the closing. And then comes another extended metaphor of a song, the one that brought me to Joni in the first place. The first 45 I ever bought, and one of the first albums. “You Turn me on, I’m a radio.” It’s a perfect country song, something I didn’t understand at the time because I didn’t appreciate country music back then. But I’d spent my time listening to farm reports on the AM radio out of sheer boredom, and I understood what the radio was to its listeners. Listen, this is a perfect song. I don’t have much beyond that to say about it, and the years have not dimmed my love for it.
I also love “The blonde in the bleachers” especially for that rhythmic segue with “she tapes her regrets to the microphone stand,” when you’re with him, now, standing on a stage, as he reads her note as he swings into one of his more rock and roll songs. The Pretenders do this on a song (I can’t figure out which one it is but I often heard it on KINK.fm), and the Jackson Browne version of “Stay” does this (because it’s actually live). I think it’s a fine, fine thing to give your listener. Again, we end with jazz, that clarinet noodling around.
I want you to know that age thirteen, I sang “Woman of Heart and Mind” with every drop of sincerity I could, understanding and almost loathing every painful word because no other song I have ever heard before or since conveys the complexity of being a woman in love. And I somehow knew this when I was still more or less a child and had never been in love, unless of course you count Cat Stevens. I knew this was what it would actually mean to be in love, and to try to make that bond of love last. It actually scared me to death. Would love be worth this suffering, this self-obliteration?
The most painful line in this song is the last. “You know, the times you impress me most are the times when you don’t try…when you don’t even try.”
It took a few years for me to understand “Judgement of the Moon and Stars.” I’m fairly sure I took this one to my mother or brother to learn that it was about Beethoven going deaf, which made sense of “No tongue in the bell and the fishwives yell but they. might as well be mute.” I know I listened to it repeatedly when I was studying Linda Bierds in college, because she wrote a poem about his deafness. Even though I didn’t initially understand what this song was about, I loved the symphonic transition when she tells him to “shake your fist like lightning, now, you’ve got to roar like forest fires. You’ve got to spread your light like blazes all across the sky.” Tell him, Joni, tell him to rage against being “condemned to wires and hammers.” This gorgeous exhortation continues into “broken trees and elephant ivories” because Joni is a poet, a poet, a poet. I can still remember my wonder as the images coalesced into a piano in my young mind. Magic.
I love this record, maybe best of all, but I’m sure I’ll say that about at least three of hers as I continue to delve into these songs. With For the Roses, Joni Mitchell awakened me to the existence of Canada, what with Javex bottles on the tide, and proud-headed Queen Lizzie on the copper in the fusebox. She sang seductively of the black road and double yellow line, of being a wild seed again, articulating an urge toward rootlessness that I’ve always felt and almost never followed. By opening her broken heart and letting the pain pour out in song, she warned me of the cost of love. Mostly, through her puzzling, powerful lyrical metaphors, Joni Mitchell awakened me to poetry.


I think finding out that my first husband died knocked loose some bravery. Here is my second published piece about being nineteen years old and heading out of Montana and into a new life. The last one I posted was a haibun series. This one is an essay.
You can read it here: A Purse Full of Change: When I left Missoula
I have a poem called “A Robot Brings Flowers” at NewMyths, a fantasy/science fiction journal. You can read it here:
I wrote this poem in ekphrastic response to a beautiful piece of art, “Yellow Flowers” by Carla Paton. This was part of the Ekphrastic Challenge by Rattle.com, and when I saw it, my heart just kind of exploded with tenderness.
I’ve linked to the illustration below.
Yellow Flowers” by Carla Paton


I am so pleased to have this five-poem haibun sequence published by The Mackinaw, a journal of prose poetry. These five chapters work together to tell the story of leaving my first marriage, which really started before we were ever married when I first saw Portland, Oregon. Each part of the sequence has a slightly different tone. “Escape 1980” is my personal favorite.
This is a nice example of the form, and it captures the longing and sadness of those miserable teen years, but I didn’t feel it belonged in the sequence. So I’ll put it here.
The Planet
One afternoon while visiting my parents in Portland, I watched “Silent Running” on TV. It’s about a manned spacecraft that holds geodesic domes that preserve Earth’s environments; desert, jungle, forest, arctic. The crew is helped by three small beeping droids, clear forerunners to R2D2. Forces on Earth decide to end this mission, and the ecological domes are slated for destruction. Bruce Dern is a crew member who refuses to accept that the mission is over. He rebels. At the end, it’s just him and one droid, and Dern is failing, too. So he makes a decision. He tells the little robot, “When I was a boy, I put a message in a bottle, and I threw it into the ocean. That’s what you are. A message in a bottle.” The final shot is the geodesic dome holding the little droid floating in space, carefully tending what’s left of Earth’s animals and vegetation. I was quietly devastated. For a full day after watching this movie, I would think of it and burst into tears. Earth, as far as I know, is alone in this universe. Despite searches and radio waves, telescopes and crafts of exploration, we still haven’t found any evidence of life as we know it. Our planet is that little dome of earthly life, floating alone in space. Sometimes the weight of that is almost more than I can bear.
wheeling, watering
alone in the universe
tiny guardian

I’m starting with the first record I heard by Joni, which was Ladies of the Canyon. When I was thirteen, Brother Steve brought it home from Minneapolis, where he attended art school. Home for me was a log cabin at a ranger station near the mouth of Gallatin Canyon, in Montana. Steve was my musical mentor, bringing me song after song because he hoped I’d love them. And I did, though Joni sang a little high for me.
These songs are so personal, a sung diary from a young woman in a magical world I longed for: music, artists, sunshine, longhaired men who were really still boys. A world to walk around in as opposed to getting into a car and driving somewhere, which is what we had to do to reach Bozeman. I was fascinated with boys but fearful of them. No “Morning Morgantown” for me, no rising from a man’s bed and venturing out in the city with my love. She might as well have been singing about the surface of the moon.
Besides, I was notoriously awful in the morning (still am).
I loved most the songs I could sing. “For Free” was keyed perfectly for me and it also told that haunting story. I’m sure my family got tired of listening to me crooooon alooooong to this song, as well as “Willie,” which I loved because I could break out the vibrato. Just imagine a thirteen year old girl warbling, “Willie is my chiiiiild, he is my faaaaather,” and then trying to hit the notes for “our love cannot be real.” Really. My parents could be very patient.
As a girl, I didn’t really understand “Conversation,” but an adult, I will tell you that “Conversation” has me shaking my head. It’s like “Poetry Man.” They capture a specific kind of heartbreak, the naive belief that you’d be better for a man than the woman he prefers. He banks the fires of his ego with your adoration, then returns to the woman he loves. Oh, my young heart bought right in, but my adult heart quietly ushers those men right on back to their homes.
I didn’t understand “The Arrangement” either, a song indicting capitalism, which is fine, and she does some interesting things with her voice, some truly haunting pyrotechnic runs that gave her nodes. But it meant nothing to me as a kid and I probably lifted the needle right over this one (remember how skilled we were at that?).
I loved “Rainy Night House” because it told me another non-relatable story, again with lovely vocal agility. It was also keyed low, so I could sing it without straining or offending the ears of my family. “Blue Boy” was another mystery I enjoyed, despite how troubling “roll her in his arms and give his seed to her” was to my virginal ears. As a girl, I thought it was about a statue that came to life, an idea I liked. As an adult I know it was one more song about Joni throwing her love away on a manchild.
Everyone knows and loves “Big Yellow Taxi,” and they should because it’s fun and playful and a pleasing antidote the heaviness that precedes it. But that goes right into “Woodstock.” And I’ll tell you, at age thirteen, as I sat there with headphones on and album cover in hand, listening to the lyrics of this song, I understood poetry for the first time. This song’s complex, layered lyrics sent my young mind spinning, enlarging, opening to the linguistic possibilities of metaphor.
“The Circle Game” is a singalong, and so sweet, and ends the record on a hopeful note after all the wooooo, and choral doom, and sad love stories on this record. But I saved the most important song for last.
“Ladies of the Canyon” enchanted and perplexed me at age thirteen. I listened to it over and over, because exactly which archetypal lady of the canyon would I be? Trina, Anna, Estrella, so deftly sketched and yet, so mysterious (as was this canyon of which she sang, I lived in a canyon myself but had never heard of Laurel Canyon or I’d probably have steeled my heart and taken off hitchhiking to reach it).
But back to the ladies. I thought these were the three choices available to me and I wasn’t sure where I fit. Trina was clearly a clothing artist (she wears her wampum beads? Seriously?). But hey, I had a really cool secondhand coat from my Grandma Lucille, so maybe, even though I was thirteen and too tall and curvy and pale and awkward. I started thrifting that year and wore outrageously strange clothing for an eighth grader, but it wasn’t exactly lace and filigree. I understood the look, I just couldn’t quite imagine myself pulling it off.
And then, in the next verse, bless her, Anna sat you down to eat while a horde of extremely fat cats and children twisted around her ankles. I could see this kitchen in my mind, and I liked it, but I didn’t enjoy making or eating most baked goods. I loved cats, but babies? Nope. Not a fan. Also, Anna was clearly the earth mother of the outfit. I was still planning to evade motherhood and I absolutely did not want to be Anna, nourishing, giving, fecund Anna, with her open door and all those goddamned baked goods. Anyone but Anna.
Estrella (Circus Girl) was definitely the most mysterious and arresting, so artistically described with “songs like tiny hammers hurled / at beveled mirrors in empty halls.” But then she was out there sailing seas and climbing banyans. Obviously I didn’t write songs or go on overseas adventures. Somehow I knew, at age thirteen, that I didn’t have the soul of an adventurer and feared I never would. Case in point, I never once ran away from home. But oh, how I wanted to be that woman, fearless and traveled, with her shattering songs and gypsy shawls.
I really hate to break it to my thirteen year-old self, but of the three, I am most definitely the woman with the open door and the plump babies and the flowers on her table. It’s been small dogs over here, not cats. And I am no baker. But I’ll sit you down and feed you whenever you need it.

Apparently there is a sizable group of people who collect security envelopes because they love the internal patterns. Read about it here: https://dirt.fyi/article/2026/05/inside-and-outside
The whole idea is absurd and yet, somehow, some way, it makes complete sense to me. Human beings are strange, I tell you. So strange. Please don’t worry, I will not be collecting a new thing. Or if I do, it will not be security envelopes.