Monthly Archives: January 2026

Making Excuses

What a hoodlum.
Your Red-Eyed Juvenile Delinquent, 1974

The Excuse

When I was in ninth grade in Bozeman, Montana, I had my first experience with needing a written pass from the office to get back into classes. It was quite a system. When you missed a day of school, or even a class period, you had to go to the attendance office with a written excuse from your mother (or maybe your father, but everyone brought notes from their mothers). These notes were filed for comparison. Your note would be checked against the previous, to make sure you weren’t bringing in a fake excuse.

Then, the secretary of attendance or whoever she was would sign a little printed slip of paper, rip it off the pad, and give it to you. You had to present this official document at the beginning of each class period for review and initialing by each teacher. The last teacher of the day would keep it and send it back to the office. This was for an excused absence, as opposed to an unexcused absence, which could lead to trouble.

What a Pain!

This junior high was the largest school I’d ever attended, and I’d never before had to go through this much rigamarole after an absence. It seemed like a lot, especially for a girl with an older boyfriend who had a car. I had a bright idea. I wrote the first note from my mother myself. When the attendance person compared the current note to the original note on file, the handwriting matched. I didn’t have a single unexcused absence that year, even though my attendance record was abysmal.

Mr. Orr, who taught social studies, told me I was missing too many classes. He was angry at me, and it made an impression. All these years later, I can see his curly hair, his red face, his slightly buggy eyes as he leaned his face near mine, the sound of his angry voice telling me I wasn’t living up to my academic potential. I replied that I had straight As, so of course I was living up to my potential. He insisted. “No, Karen, grades aren’t everything. No matter what your grade is, if you’re missing this much class, you could be doing better.” I had to admit he was right. I started going to his class, even though it was right after lunch and that was prime time for skipping.

Additional Crime Skills

I was fairly skilled at forging signatures. It wasn’t difficult to palm one of those little pads of paper, and I’d sign them ten at a time and hand them out like candy. There was an attempt by the administration to halt the circulation of forged passes by drawing secret symbols on the backs of the official excuses, but I had friends who were not delinquents who’d happily cue me in as to what the symbol was, a star or a dollar sign, and in which corner I should place it. I carried on.

My disruption of the ninth grade attendance system only lasted one year (to be fair I also gave passes to some of my favorite eighth graders – Dee Strong, I’m looking at you). In tenth grade, I moved to Yakima to live with my boyfriend. As my pretend husband, he wrote my notes. This was laughably weird for everyone involved. It bothered the attendance ladies to the point where they just let me go back to class without an excuse.

Okay, all you other Karen Berrys

Karen Berry in Georgia

You signed me up for Match.com. I don’t want to belong to Match.com. That account is canceled, please sign up under your own email address instead of mine, “Mary.” I also get your job alerts, by the way. Maybe you found a job and now you’re looking for love, but listen, I get more Georgia stuff than I get from any other state. I’m not sure why you can’t type your own email address instead of mine and I don’t care. Just, please, make it stop.

Karen Berry in Europe Somewhere

Do you realize that you ordered your expensive something-in-Spain tour tickets to my email address? My email address here in Oregon? I am not currently in Spain (and never have been) but if I were in Spain I’d have definitely gone to see whatever that was you spent all those Euros on! I wonder if you arrived at your tourist location without tickets, or if you caught your mistake beforehand. I also want you to know that I didn’t cancel your taxi reservations to the airport this time, but I have before. Yes, it was me, so please use your own email address in the future.

Karen Berry in Central Oregon

You signed me up for CuddleMe.com or something like that. It’s like that site you signed me up for last year, LetsFlirt.com or some such garbage. These are sites for married people who want to cheat, and I am married but I do NOT want to cheat, so please stop. Last time you did this, I signed in and looked at your photo and profile before I cancelled (you’re very pretty). This time I just blocked all that mess. I’m not going to the trouble of changing the password and cancelling the account. But if you are wondering why you get no extramarital flirtation action, this is why. Are you the person who signed me up for Ashley Madison? Please please please. I tell my husband when this happens, just on the off chance that there is another data breach and it looks like I’m in the market for philandering. Use your own email account, please.

UK Karen Berry who is a Compulsive Gambler

Look. We share a name, not a proclivity for online gambling. But judging by the email I keep getting, and the number of dark web password theft alert notifications generated by your use of my email on gambling sites, I think you really have a problem. UK Karen Berry, I don’t know if you’re the Welsh Karen Berry or the Dublin Karen Berry or maybe the New Zealand Karen Berry, but you need help! Get help!

And that is enough grumpy ranting for the day.

mannequins in swim caps in a circle in a pond playing Keno
image courtesy Pixabay.com

Some Thoughts on Marty Supreme

A whacking time of it.

table tennis racket and ball about to be served
Image by Claudia Peters from Pixabay

I didn’t know much about this movie before going in, only that it starred Timothy Chalamet, it was about table tennis, and it was touted as an Oscar contender before it was even released. I wanted to see it. This is part of a larger intention on the part of me and my husband to see more movies and less series. Recently that’s been Eddington and One Battle After Another on streaming, with plans to use those fabulous Regal gift cards for Marty Supreme and Hamnet.

Okay. I have a soft spot for the kind of movie where nothing goes right for our hero, whether or not his disasters are of his own making. That starts way back at It’s a Wonderful Life and stretches through What’s Eating Gilbert Grape and Dan in Real Life and Inside Llewyn Davis and The Joker on up to, well, Eddington, One Battle After Another, and now Marty Supreme. There is something intensely compelling in watching human action in the face of one battle after another (see what I did there). It’s the basis of action movies, which I don’t usually watch, and these movies, where the catastrophes are small and personal.

And this isn’t about the so-called likeability of the character at all. Llewyn Davis was a self-centered prick who was somehow unable to make one good decision. Still, I was fiercely urging him on. My heart was bleeding for Phoenix’s Joker and he was a psychopath. In Eddington, another of Phoenix’s characters bumbled from one catastrophe to another, continuously making his situation less and less survivable. Everyone in that movie was either insane or corrupt except for one character, who in the final shot of the movie is radicalized and ready to wreak havoc for what has been done to him. Still, I didn’t regret watching it, and I understood the characters.

I’m not saying that any of these movies are a walk in the park, a feel-good afternoon with popcorn. I’m saying that if I can find the terrifying actions of Colonel Lockjaw compelling, understandable, and impossible not to watch, I have a high tolerance for monomaniacal assholes on the big screen.

I couldn’t stand to watch Marty Mauser.

He made no sense to me. He left behind a trail of mayhem in the name of WHAT. He actually destroyed cars, homes, reputations, businesses, and LIVES. He underwent utter humiliation and wreaked physical havoc on everyone he met in order to get where he believed he belonged. He was not a man whose triumph I could possibly celebrate.

The movie, as a piece of work, has a complex, twisting script that is word-for-word brilliant. Every single thing about the production is perfectly done. There are moments, especially those around the women in Marty’s life, that are so compelling. I mean, watching Fran Descher actually act, with not much more to work with besides the conflicted intensity of a mother’s gaze? The graceful faded swan that is Gwyneth Paltrow? The fecund beauty and spirited-if-misplaced loyalty of Odessa A’zion?

Those are the women, but every single actor is a marvel, in fact. Koto Kawaguchi invests his character with a focused grace that is the absolute opposite of Marty. This performance was the standout of the movie for me, the perfect counterpoint to all of Marty’s bombast and frenetic energy. I could go on about Tyler the Creator and Kevin O’Leary, but they are just at the top of a list of actors who invest every part with humanity, no matter how small. I mean, even the rubes at the bowling alley are magnificent. There’s also a dog that gives his all, a dog that arrives covered in shit and is last seen barking and snarling as if he will rip apart anyone near him.

And yet, folks.

And yet. Chalamet knifes his way through his role with pointed intensity, hitting every note, never stopping for an instant, fully committed to his destiny as the table tennis king. Was it actually his job to enlist me in this quest? If so, he failed. For me, he was like that dog, a loud, terrifying catastrophe waiting to sink his teeth into anyone to get out, out, out and on his way to wherever he thinks he needs to be. He did what he needed to do perfectly, but I didn’t want him anywhere near me.

That’s my review. I’d love to hear what you think of the movie.

David Arndt on Critique

From his book Philosophy of Writing:

Even the most obtuse and unjust criticism can be inadvertently illuminating and helpful, if it shows how our writing is open to being misread. The hardest task of writing is to look for grains of truth in criticism that seems stupid and unfair. Listen to feedback carefully: pick out the grains of truth, correct the distortions, and ignore the blind spots.

That is perhaps the most graceful and useful advice I’ve ever read on how to handle criticism of a work in progress.

That is all.

Yanking the chain – Byron and Blake

A Non-trad student, that was me.

When I went back to school as a non-trad student (meaning old), I had a professor who was losing control of his classes. By that, I mean, he couldn’t keep the thread of his lectures. He wandered from topic to topic, reacting defensively when another student asked him what his ramblings had to do with Blake and Byron, who were the subjects of the only class I ever took from him.

The Byron and Blake class was one of the many classes in the English department taught to both high-level English majors (like me), and grad students (not like me). The grad students had to turn in an additional paper and an annotated bibliography. My friend Denise and I exchanged scribbled notes that mocked one grad student who kept drawing parallels between the Romantics and the Beats. Everything inspired him to draw long verbal comparisons, especially Beats-with-Blake, which is silly because Blake was his own visionary self, not really part of the Romantics (was he supposed to be their Kerouac? I can’t remember. Maybe he was their Ginsberg). Nothing could stop the discourses of this young man.

Okay, but at least he talked a bit about Blake, which was more than the professor did. He just kept going on about Byron. Our teacher loved Byron, but aside from the professor’s insistence on saying “Don Joo-ahn” (apparently that is the correct way to pronounce the title of Byron’s masterwork) I wasn’t learning much. In fact, that was nearly the sum total of what I absorbed about this poem.

I was not the only person feeling baffled by how little I was actually learning. I was 39 when I took this course as an undergraduate, but not the oldest person in attendance. There were several 65+ auditors in the class. One of them actually said out loud what most of us were thinking, words to the effect that she’d taken this class because she’d heard that our professor was an expert on Blake and Byron, but she was still waiting for evidence of that. “I took this class for your brilliant insights, and I’m getting nothing.” It was brutal. It was also true. I want to audit classes next year, and I wonder if I will ever be so pointed.

She was frustrated, and she was only auditing. Those of us who had paid money to take the course as part of our degree requirements were probably more frustrated, because we were expected to produce papers on these Romantic legends. How? I’d turned in exactly one paper in this class, a close reading paper on Byron’s poem, “Darkness.” There is so much meat in this poem that I certainly didn’t need an instructor to explain it to me. It’s long, but I’m putting it here because it reminds me of our present day situation of toppling institutions, billionaire oligarchs, and climate disaster.

Read if you’d like, or not–if not, you’ll need to scroll.

Darkness, Lord Byron

I had a dream, which was not all a dream.

The bright sun was extinguish’d, and the stars

Did wander darkling in the eternal space,

Rayless, and pathless, and the icy earth

Swung blind and blackening in the moonless air;

Morn came and went—and came, and brought no day,

And men forgot their passions in the dread

Of this their desolation; and all hearts

Were chill’d into a selfish prayer for light:

And they did live by watchfires—and the thrones,

The palaces of crowned kings—the huts,

The habitations of all things which dwell,

Were burnt for beacons; cities were consum’d,

And men were gather’d round their blazing homes

To look once more into each other’s face;

Happy were those who dwelt within the eye

Of the volcanos, and their mountain-torch:

A fearful hope was all the world contain’d;

Forests were set on fire—but hour by hour

They fell and faded—and the crackling trunks

Extinguish’d with a crash—and all was black.

The brows of men by the despairing light

Wore an unearthly aspect, as by fits

The flashes fell upon them; some lay down

And hid their eyes and wept; and some did rest

Their chins upon their clenched hands, and smil’d;

And others hurried to and fro, and fed

Their funeral piles with fuel, and look’d up

With mad disquietude on the dull sky,

The pall of a past world; and then again

With curses cast them down upon the dust,

And gnash’d their teeth and howl’d: the wild birds shriek’d

And, terrified, did flutter on the ground,

And flap their useless wings; the wildest brutes

Came tame and tremulous; and vipers crawl’d

And twin’d themselves among the multitude,

Hissing, but stingless—they were slain for food.

And War, which for a moment was no more,

Did glut himself again: a meal was bought

With blood, and each sate sullenly apart

Gorging himself in gloom: no love was left;

All earth was but one thought—and that was death

Immediate and inglorious; and the pang

Of famine fed upon all entrails—men

Died, and their bones were tombless as their flesh;

The meagre by the meagre were devour’d,

Even dogs assail’d their masters, all save one,

And he was faithful to a corse, and kept

The birds and beasts and famish’d men at bay,

Till hunger clung them, or the dropping dead

Lur’d their lank jaws; himself sought out no food,

But with a piteous and perpetual moan,

And a quick desolate cry, licking the hand

Which answer’d not with a caress—he died.

The crowd was famish’d by degrees; but two

Of an enormous city did survive,

And they were enemies: they met beside

The dying embers of an altar-place

Where had been heap’d a mass of holy things

For an unholy usage; they rak’d up,

And shivering scrap’d with their cold skeleton hands

The feeble ashes, and their feeble breath

Blew for a little life, and made a flame

Which was a mockery; then they lifted up

Their eyes as it grew lighter, and beheld

Each other’s aspects—saw, and shriek’d, and died—

Even of their mutual hideousness they died,

Unknowing who he was upon whose brow

Famine had written Fiend. The world was void,

The populous and the powerful was a lump,

Seasonless, herbless, treeless, manless, lifeless—

A lump of death—a chaos of hard clay.

The rivers, lakes and ocean all stood still,

And nothing stirr’d within their silent depths;

Ships sailorless lay rotting on the sea,

And their masts fell down piecemeal: as they dropp’d

They slept on the abyss without a surge—

The waves were dead; the tides were in their grave,

The moon, their mistress, had expir’d before;

The winds were wither’d in the stagnant air,

And the clouds perish’d; Darkness had no need

Of aid from them—She was the Universe.

And this is one of Byron’s shorter poems. Doesn’t it seem prescient? Or am I just recovering from watching “Eddington” last night? Maybe one day I’ll dig out the cardboard box that holds my college papers and read what I had to say about this dark litany, but there is another paper in that box more germane to this story, so back to the story we go.

Well, then. Anyway…

As the deadline for our final project approached, I became angry. Aside from his short works, Byron was doing nothing for me. The instructor would rhapsodize about how people would line up on the docks to get the latest installment of Don Juan, but that didn’t inspire me to read any more than the assigned passages. I found nothing in those to inspire a thesis. A topic was needed, so I decided to educate myself on Blake, because the professor had spent so much time on Byron, Blake had barely been mentioned.

Off I went to the PSU library. I researched, made notes, turned over motifs I’d noticed, wondered what to make of them that could be supported by criticism without recapitulating someone else’s ideas wholesale. I produced a final paper on Blake’s chain imagery. I was especially proud of this paper because I had gotten nothing out of the class. Whatever I’d written, I’d found on my own.

But wait. There’s more.

As relieved as I was to be done with this embarrassment of a class, it wasn’t over yet. We would receive our final grades in person, at a one-on-one meeting with the professor. My mood was slightly truculent as I went to his office and sat down.

I intended to tell him how hard it had been to learn anything in his class, but I didn’t have a chance. He began to talk about what a difficult quarter it had been for him. He’d been in denial about how deeply his lack of hearing had affected his teaching. He’d misheard or missed much of what his students had to say, and knew it had affected his teaching. He planned to get hearing aids, but after he read the class evaluations, he was so discouraged that he’d considered retirement.

He lay a hand on my paper. “But when I read a paper like yours, I know I’m still doing a fine job. I have to be, if my students are producing work of this caliber.”

I didn’t have the heart to tell him. I nodded, and left with my A. 

black dog with brown eyebrow dots, probably a Doberman
in honor of the poor loyal dog that guarded the “corse” in Byron’s “Darkness.”
Image by Briam Cute from Pixabay

Follow

Get the latest posts delivered to your mailbox: